Member-only story
The Ancient Roman Bridge, a Timeless Engineering Feat
Ancient Romans were the first major bridge builders. Through extensive use of the arch and concrete they perfected, they built the biggest and longest-lasting bridges of antiquity.

Stone arch after stone arch. That is the basics of an Ancient Roman bridge. Their shape and form don’t change much from that. Although it doesn’t sound fancy presented like this, it is yet another of the Ancient Romans' exceptional engineering feats. I’ll explain why.
The key to the Ancient Roman bridge was the “true” arch, built with stone, and the concrete they so expertly perfected, the Roman concrete or opus caementicium. Yet, alongside these two key components were important technological features and design details.
Origins
Arches were the first evolution away from the post-and-lintel structure that had existed for thousands of years in Neolithic civilizations (i.e.: until 2,000 BC in the Egyptian, Hellenistic, or Indian civilizations). It was initially a ‘corbel arch’ or ‘corbelled arch’, built as the higher the structure rose the more it offset towards the centerline. It is called a “false arch” because it is not self-supporting per sé.
The arch as we see it everywhere today, the “true arch”, appeared around 2,000 BC in Mesopotamia and it was built in bricks. An arch is a compression form, no tensile stresses happen (called “arch action”), transferring the forces all the way to the ground through the ‘springers’, the linear supports that begin when the curved part ends (e.g.: columns).

Although the arch is self-supporting, there is a risk of collapse due to the lateral ‘thrust’. To avoid this, the structure is secured with ‘tie-rods’ or external supports such as abutments. Arches within a wall — or consecutive arches in a bridge — do not have that issue as there is another structure at its sides.
The arch requires a very simple construction method allowing for strength, flexibility, and aesthetics.